Eating in Lisbon
What Seemor's reading of 3,332 Lisbon restaurants says about the food scene: how varied it is, what the places locals favour serve and charge, and how they compare with the ones that draw visitors. One section per question we have answered so far; more arrive with each post.
How varied is the food?
Compare with other cities →It takes 11 cuisines to cover 90% of the restaurants, 27th widest of the 38 cities measured. Portuguese alone is 53%; 47 cuisines appear at all.
What this measures
Share of analyzed restaurants by cuisine. Home cuisine in navy, the next seven in blues, every other cuisine in gray. From Which city has the most diverse food: it depends how you count.
- Portuguese53%
- Italian9.3%
- Japanese7.0%
- American3.8%
- Brazilian3.7%
- Chinese2.8%
- Indian2.6%
- Cafe2.3%
- + 39 more cuisines, 15% between them
Where the locals eat
Compare with other cities →757 local-leaning, 1,755 mixed-appeal and 820 tourist-leaning restaurants, split by Seemor's reading of the crowd each place draws. From Where do the locals actually eat?
Cuisine
Portuguese is 89% of local-leaning restaurants, 40% of mixed-appeal ones and 44% of tourist-leaning ones.
What this measures
What each restaurant serves, grouped into cuisines. Cuisines under 15 restaurants in a city are pooled as Other. Under each city: the home cuisine opened up by kind of place (pizzeria, trattoria, pub, diner and so on), read from how each restaurant describes itself.
- Portuguese89% · 40% · 44%
- Italian1% · 11% · 13%
- Japanese1% · 10% · 6%
- Brazilian2% · 5% · 3%
Inside the Portuguese places
52% of Lisbon · 1,744 restaurants · 676 local-leaning, 706 mixed appeal, 362 tourist-leaningTasca leads the local-leaning Portuguese places (59%); tourist-leaning ones lead with Marisqueira (26%).
- Tasca59% · 24% · 9%
- Churrasqueira14% · 8% · 1%
- Marisqueira6% · 13% · 26%
- Pastelaria4% · 6% · 4%
Price
45% of tourist-leaning places are expensive or above, 24% of mixed-appeal ones and 6% of local-leaning ones.
What this measures
Price band read from menus and reviews, four bands from budget to very expensive. Places with no price reading are left out.
- Budget58% · 22% · 8%
- Moderate36% · 54% · 47%
- Expensive6% · 23% · 43%
- Very expensive0% · 1% · 2%
Food, value and setting
82% of local-leaning places score 8+ on food, 63% of mixed-appeal ones, 41% of tourist-leaning ones; on setting it is 38%, 56% and 82%.
What this measures
Share of restaurants reading 8 or higher on food quality, and 7 or higher on value for money and on setting appeal, on Seemor's 1 to 10 scale. Bands, not averages.
Neighborhoods
In Baixa, 70% of restaurants are tourist-leaning and 5% local-leaning; in Benfica it is 0% and 61%.
What this measures
Share of each neighborhood's restaurants in each crowd band. The whole city first, then the 5 neighborhoods with the most tourist-leaning restaurants and the 5 with the most local-leaning, each group ordered by tourist-leaning share. Neighborhoods are Seemor's own place hierarchy; only those with 25 or more restaurants carrying a crowd reading are drawn. Under it: every neighborhood of every city on one chart.
The whole city
2,195 restaurants inside a named neighborhoodWhere the tourist-leaning places are
the 5 neighborhoods with the most of them, ordered by shareWhere the local-leaning places are
the 5 neighborhoods with the most of them, ordered by shareThe same ten on the map of every city
1,549 neighborhoods in 43 citiesIf each city's restaurants were scattered across its neighborhoods at random, about 63 of these 1,549 neighborhoods would have a fifth of their restaurants in each crowd. 10 do.
599 of these restaurants carry a full Seemor analysis and 2,733 a lighter one; both give a crowd reading on the same 1 to 10 scale. The most local places count as local-leaning, the most tourist-drawn as tourist-leaning, the rest as mixed appeal. The diversity section uses the article's own count (3,304 restaurants, October 2026); the rest uses the October 2026 extract. Shares in bands, never individual scores. City boundaries are Seemor's own place hierarchy, not the municipal line.